Japanese Movement Replica Omega Railmaster Seamaster Aqua Terra 150m Co Axial Automatic 42mm
Over this brief time period, though, a number of variants of the Railmaster CK2914 were produced. Most had black dials, however there were some versions with white dials, such as some with railroad-style numerals and markers. The hands varied a great deal as well, with the most recognizable black dial, with its triangle-shaped luminous markers, being paired with broad arrow, dauphine, along with baton-shaped palms in different configurations. While the various varieties make classic Railmasters particularly intriguing, it also makes understanding if a given example is bad or good a challenge. This is one of those watches where you truly wish to consult an expert before jumping.The most lasting effect of the Railmaster, however, is observed in Omega’s commitment to anti-magnetism in all of its contemporary watches. There’s no brand now that’s pushing harder in this direction, and Omega has been doing so for quite some time. The Seamaster Aqua Terra 15,000 Gauss surely got a lot of attention as it premiered in 2013, but Omega has quietly (and sometimes not so quietly) been integrating that technology into all of its high-end moves too. The brand’s stated aim is to make its moves as lasting as possible and to decrease the frequency with which they need to get serviced. This view sits within Omega’s primary Seamaster collection, together with the various Aqua Terra and Planet Ocean watches. While initially I thought this was a peculiar option, the logic sort of makes sense to me now. Rather than committing the Railmaster its own top-line collection — putting it alongside the Speedmaster and Constellation — putting it over the Seamaster collection places the watch in the context of the strides made inside that family over the past ten years or two and underscores that the Railmaster’s unique properties are not something to be walled off. Instead, this is a stylistic divergence that brings its weight to keep on the rest of the Seamaster versions too.
By enclosing the watch’s motion in soft iron, they effectively created a Faraday cage, protecting against around 1,000 Gauss or 80,000 A/m. While conceptually cool, the Railmaster wasn’t a significant hit (neither was the early Milgauss) along with the watch has been discontinued in 1963. While its brief lifespan refused the Railmaster exactly the exact same prestige as its “master” siblings, it will equate to high collectibility on the vintage market. No matter there it stayed in the archives until 2003, when it left a bit of an odd resurgence. Now beneath the Seamaster Aqua Terra lineup, the 2003 versions were accessible 36, 39, 42 and a monstrous 50mm (with a manual Unitas movement). I will get to co-axial moves later, but these were one of the first watches by the brand to game this groundbreaking technologies created by George Daniels.These Railmasters appear to have remained in the line for a longer time, finally disappearing in 2012. While visually attractive and sticking into the design motif of the original, this era of this Railmaster had a significant conceptual flaw (though I doubt it played in their eventual retirement)–they had no consideration for magnetism. There was no soft iron cage shielding the co-axial escapement. Quite the contrary, actually–they featured display case backs. It appears they were Railmasters due to their chronometer status–playing off of the idea of the railroad view–and dial layout only.
While this is most likely the most elegantly executed vintage lume I’ve seen, I can’t help but question its usage a bit. It seems good and it goes really nicely with the brushed black dial, but this watch is not a re-creation such as the 60th Anniversary edition is, nor does it look vintage. It is a modern interpretation of the Railmaster. Crisp white or green lume would probably still look great with this watch. Maybe it’s not an issue of either/or, also it’s a matter of getting the choice because this version is unquestionably stylish, but a purely modern variant could be tempting as well.You’ll then locate three, six, nine and 12 numerals printed in white, and a cross-hair tying the numerals and branding components together. Let’s begin with the numerals. That is a detail from the original, but at a typeface that’s a lot more graphic and modern. At first, I kind of longed for the bolder classic text or a updated version of it, such as the sort we watched about the Seamaster 300s released two or three years ago. That said, this eventually grew on me. It is tidy, weatherproof, less baroque and it gives the watch a understated feel.Below 12 you will discover the customary Omega logo and wordmark in white, although over six you will find “Railmaster” in a hand-written script (speaking to the first) at a khaki tone, with “co-axial master chronometer” beneath in small caps in white. While there’s a decent quantity of text above, I think that it’s well proportioned, mirroring the emblem at 12 in fat. Extending from three to eight and also the logo to the text block are thin white lines developing a cross-hair. It subtly uses up negative space, and while maybe not a detail about the first, it will remember mid-20th century designs.
It’s a trendy look, however, the black dial just felt more well-tuned. The year 1957 was a stunning one for Omega. The first two are probably best known, the Railmaster is a bit longer a ‘collectors only’ piece these days. However, that is the opinion we’re covering in this review. The 60th anniversary edition that’s, that premiered last year.You’ve seen the Omega 1957 Trilogy box set with reedition of the 3 legends (if not, click here). This view was there for engineers and scientists,The case of the Railmaster was antimagnetic, which made it perfectly usable in a environment where it had protection against magnetic fields. But, Omega was not the only brand that developed such a timepiece. Both IWC (Ingenieur) and Rolex (Milgauss) needed a piece of the market. While definitely the Railmaster CK2914 has been the least favorite of the 3 models, some mythical timepieces still found their ways to the historybooks until Omega stopped them in 1963. I’m talking about watches such as the P.A.F. (Pakistani Air Force) and F.A.P. (Fuerza Aerea del Peru — Peruvian Air Force) Railmasters.Omega went the extra mile with all the 1957 re-editions in terms of getting as close to the original in every detail as possible. The measurements of this case are technically identical to the classic pieces. It’s 38mm, something you seldom see as highlight out of a brand these days. It wears and looks amazing, even on a larger wrist like mine (7.5″) regardless if you have it on bracelet or strap. The drag width is exactly the same 19mm as the first Railmaster CK2914. In fact all three models share the exact same lug width. It is a mixture of brushed (sides) and polished (high in the lugs) components)
Most of us consider dive watches and hearty chronographs as instrument watches, but the Railmaster was a tool watch of another sort: It was an watch for scientists who could stand up to the magnetic fields encountered in the laboratory. As you likely know, magnetism can wreak havoc to a mechanical watch, distorting the balance spring and affecting its ability to maintain a secure frequency, and thus maintain accurate time. The CK2914 utilized a gentle iron inner case as a Faraday Cage along with a thicker dial to protect the motion from external magnetic areas of strengths as much as 1,000 Gauss. Omega was not the only watch manufacturer producing this kind of watch. The opinion was produced from 1956 until 1988 (with there being two main productions at that time frame, the 6543/6541 and the 1019), until it was again revived in 2007. Likewise, IWC has got the Ingenieur, which really came before the Milgauss or even the Railmaster, debuting at 1954. At the time, IWC already had a history of creating anti-magnetic watches for pilots, therefore the Ingenieur seemed a logical next step. Two decades later, it would get an overhaul by Gerald Genta at the kind of this Ingenieur SL and now the brand has retained the lineup living as a selection of racing-inspired watches, though that’s a story for a different time.While technologically innovative and functional for a very special type of wearer, the Railmaster wasn’t a top seller for Omega and the model was retired in 1963, only six years after its launching. You need to remember, this was the age of typewriters, rotary phones, and manual transmissions — see wearers were not contending with a world full of electronics, all of which create some level of magnetism a mechanical watch must deal with in 1 way or another.
The final picture element of the dial is a railroad index round the outer border. Another departure from the original design, it is a marginally on-the-nose reference to rails, but it is nonetheless visually appealing. I quite enjoy the contrast between the burden of this lean line on this index and the daring triangles that cut through it. All together, the dial elements play off of each very well, developing a balanced whole that’s as legible as it is stylish.For hands, Omega went with brushed batons with khaki lume filling for the hour and minute, and a lollipop minutes hand. This is a small departure from the original, which is famous for using a broad arrow and dauphine minutes (like what you will see on the 60th Anniversary). Nevertheless, there were a few baton-handed models made back in the ’50s–they’re just rare. Anyway, at first I thought, well, that is a bit of a shame as the broad arrow hand is really distinctive, and while Omega wasn’t the only new to utilize them, their usage definitely tied in with the mythology. Then I thought this is a new opinion and not a copy, so what would work best here is unrelated to all that. Along with the baton hands, although more common, possess a purposeful, sporty look. Like the change in typeface for the hour numerals, they are somewhat more understated, which is something I could always get behind. The lume on the palms also glows more blue than the dial.Before moving, the Railmaster can be available using a steel grey dial. Though maybe not on-hand for the inspection, I had the chance to see it in person and try it on for a few minutes, so I figured I would offer my impressions. It is a really distinctive appearance and a far further departure from the original. At first blush, it had been the more attractive of both, but the added contrast in the black dial created that model pull ahead.
The new Railmaster includes a Master Chronometer motion inside, which far surpasses the initial watch at its goal, but does not require any protecting, thus may be on full view. Here, revealing the caliber 8600 could have felt like the opinion (and Omega) celebrated the accomplishment more. Also, the Omega grade 8XXX series chance to be somewhat cool looking.The dial of the Railmaster takes the original design concept of the watch into fresh and fascinating land. It still has the most distinguishing elements of the original, but mixes in a few new details making it ride involving a diversion and a modernization. The dial surface is the first thing will catch your attention. Rather than matte black, Omega has gone using a vertically brushed surface with a faded black tone. The result is contrary to other dials I’ve come across, and it is very enjoyable. The brushing is aggressive and highly random, creating a lot of variation across the surface in the tone and depth. When light strikes the dial at several angles, it alters wildly.The faded black coloring is unique also. It’s a plated color with a little bit of metallic sheen, but while it is known as black I would argue it’s really a milder graphite gray, with an almost inky, purple undertone. It’s subtle, but in some angles there is definitely a color for this, which adds to the dynamic light play from the graining.Pulling from the first, the principal index is made of bold triangle markers for its hours–short and wide at five, six, nine and 12; and thin and long for the remainder. The triangles are lumed and feature “vintage” khaki lume (Omega actually uses the word “classic” to describe it). The execution of those markers is quite unique. To begin with, they seem impossibly flat, and that’s as they are actually recessed, coming just up to the edge of the main dial surface.
Throughout its lack, Omega switched their engineer’s eyes back into the issue that first inspired the watchmagnetism. Currently utilizing silicon in the motion–that is non-ferrous by nature–along with additional non-ferrous alloys, Omega declared in 2013 their grade 8508, initially featured in the Aqua Terra >15,000 Gauss. As the name suggests, Omega outdid the preceding norm of 1,000 Gauss by 15 times, developing a watch that requires no shielding to perform (or outperform, as the case may be, those with soft-iron cages) since the movement itself can’t get magnetized.Omega introduced this technology into more of their calibers, and finally started to submit them via a new testing process, earning their >15,000 Gauss, chronometer-rated moves the title of “Master Chronometers.” Now, in 2017, 60 years after launch the Railmaster and equipped with an arsenal of high-tech technology, Omega has attracted the Railmaster back. And while you may be considering the LE anniversary model that got a lot of attention last spring, then it is really this fresh non-limited version that actually matters.Sporting that the Master Chronometer caliber 8806 with a co-axial escapement, the Seamaster Aqua Terra Railmaster is a true spiritual successor to the original, and a visual evolution on the subject. The iron cage is gone, however, the anti-magnetic theory that first defined it is still in its core. But perhaps what makes this view so intriguing to worn&bull is the very first time a Master Chronometer watch will be accessible just shy of $5,000 at $4,900 MSRP on a strap ($5,000 as exhibited on bracelet). While this certainly is far from cheap, to get a tech-laden watch in the major luxury brand, it is very competitive and reflects a unique “entry-level” luxury offering that any watch enthusiast ought to know about.
In 1957, Omega released the very first Railmaster, the mention CK2914. We all think of dive significant and chains chronographs as tool watches, but the Railmaster was a tool watch of a different kind: It was an watch for scientists who could resist the magnetic fields encountered in the lab. As you likely know, magnetism may wreak havoc to a mechanical watch, alerting the equilibrium spring and affecting its ability to maintain a secure frequency, and so maintain accurate time. The CK2914 used a soft iron inner case as a Faraday Cage and a thicker dial to shield the movement from external magnetic fields of strengths as much as 1,000 Gauss. Omega was not the only watch maker producing this type of watch. Rolex famously gets the Milgauss, which takes its name directly from the 1,000-Gauss resistance (mille being French for 1,000) and was developed in partnership with the Swiss lab CERN. Likewise, IWC has got the Ingenieur, which really arrived before either the Milgauss or even the Railmaster, debuting at 1954. At the time, IWC already had a history of creating anti-magnetic watches for pilots, therefore the Ingenieur seemed a logical next step. Two years later, it would find an overhaul by Gerald Genta in the kind of this Ingenieur SL and today the brand has retained the lineup alive as a collection of racing-inspired watches, though that’s a story for a different time.While technologically innovative and functional for a very specific kind of wearer, the Railmaster was not a top seller for Omega and the version was retired in 1963, only six years after its launch. You need to rememberthat this was the era of typewriters, rotary phones, and manual transmissions — see wearers were not contending with a world filled with electronic equipment, all of which create some amount of magnetism a mechanical watch must deal with in 1 way or another.
|Location||United States of America, Missouri, Chesterfield|
|Case diameter||42.2 x 21 mm|
Report suspicious offer
Omega Railmaster Seamaster Aqua Terra 150m Co Axial Automatic 42mm
Excellent condition no box or papers.
Out of production and very difficult to find!
Material: : Stainless steel
Glass: : Sapphire
Back: : Open
Shape: : Round
Diameter: : 42.20 mm
Lug Width: : 21.00 mm
Water Resistance: : 150.00 m